Gitkraken review code#

Gitkraken review code#

The difference in approaches may slow down further development and code support. Without code review, the team has very few instruments to predict and evaluate such risks.Īs in the example with Alice and Bob, people tend to prefer different patterns and code styles and may use different approaches to state management. Bugs can cause low-risks, like faulty UI, or high-risks, like security breaches. If there is too little code review, or no code review at all, some bugs will likely pass to production unnoticed.

The potential to introduce high-risk bugs.Ĭode Review is primarily intended to find bugs in code. Why is code review so important? What will happen if there is no code review or too much code review?ġ. What they needed was a collaborative workflow that made sense for both parties. Had they implemented a code review process from the beginning, Alice and Bob would have identified variances in style much sooner. Unfortunately, doing so requires twice as much time to fix the bug, so Bob quickly becomes annoyed and disappointed. He sees the global singleton string and, confused, changes it to the State pattern implementation, just as he did with all of the features he has implemented before. Then Alice leaves the project for a few weeks on vacation, and now Bob has to fix a bug in a feature she implemented. They work on different parts of the application committing their changes directly to the shared repo. Alice loves using a global singleton string, also known as the Singleton pattern, for state management, while Bob prefers using the State pattern. Why does this matter? Imagine two developers, Alice and Bob, writing an app together. People often have different opinions on all sorts of things, especially when it comes to code, and that is totally OK! But when it comes to the codebase used in a production application, you will want to ensure that all developers on the team speak the same language regarding naming policies or architecture patterns.